<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Most People Miss the Brilliant Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/?p=519#comment-436</guid>
		<description>On, and on the 6-8 rolls: 

Back in the day, we bulk-loaded canisters, so it was only about $1 a roll for b/w film.

Just as you suggest in your post, there came a day when the editor started focusing too much on the 6-8 rolls instead of the GREAT shots I consistently delivered.  So he decided to ration the film - 1 roll per game.

So I went to the local camera store and bought 5 more (about $4/roll at the time), proceeded to the game, and brought back an AWESOME flying tackle shot that was used front page of the section.

Editor followed up the next day with a comment along the lines of, &quot;see, you didn&#039;t need more than 1 roll.&quot;  That&#039;s when I informed him the shot on Page 1 came from roll #5 from the batch I bought, and handed him the receipt and a reimbursment form.  

He paid it.  And I never heard another thing about film rationing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On, and on the 6-8 rolls: </p>
<p>Back in the day, we bulk-loaded canisters, so it was only about $1 a roll for b/w film.</p>
<p>Just as you suggest in your post, there came a day when the editor started focusing too much on the 6-8 rolls instead of the GREAT shots I consistently delivered.  So he decided to ration the film &#8211; 1 roll per game.</p>
<p>So I went to the local camera store and bought 5 more (about $4/roll at the time), proceeded to the game, and brought back an AWESOME flying tackle shot that was used front page of the section.</p>
<p>Editor followed up the next day with a comment along the lines of, &#8220;see, you didn&#8217;t need more than 1 roll.&#8221;  That&#8217;s when I informed him the shot on Page 1 came from roll #5 from the batch I bought, and handed him the receipt and a reimbursment form.  </p>
<p>He paid it.  And I never heard another thing about film rationing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/?p=519#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Absolutely!  I&#039;m sharing this with my readers....hope you don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!  I&#8217;m sharing this with my readers&#8230;.hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Stainton</title>
		<link>http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Stainton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/?p=519#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Patrick -- Yes, that&#039;s exactly it! And I&#039;m guessing that the reason you were successful as a sports photog is because your focus was on the one great photo, not the 6-8 rolls of film it may have taken to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8212; Yes, that&#8217;s exactly it! And I&#8217;m guessing that the reason you were successful as a sports photog is because your focus was on the one great photo, not the 6-8 rolls of film it may have taken to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/why-most-people-miss-the-brilliant-idea#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovationconsulting.com/blog/?p=519#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Brilliant!

Reminds me of my previous career as a sports photographer.  I&#039;d burn up 6-8 rolls of film to get one GREAT photo for publication.

Well done, Bill....thanks for the reminder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
<p>Reminds me of my previous career as a sports photographer.  I&#8217;d burn up 6-8 rolls of film to get one GREAT photo for publication.</p>
<p>Well done, Bill&#8230;.thanks for the reminder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
